1Running Head: CASE REVIEWCase Review(Student's Name)(Institutional affiliation)2CASE REVIEWILLEGAL DISCRIMINATIONThe disparate treatment is a method of proving illegal discrimination that prevents theemployment of an individual. The individuals that make a disparate treatment claim assert thathe or she was treated differently as compared to others who were in the same situation moreoverthe difference is based on a protected manner. This protected status can be expounded on thebasis that the employee was treated differently based on their race, gender, their age or due toother protected traits.Therefore, the city of Cary is not liable because the job on offer had a particular need forthe employee in question to be able to handle complaints from the public either on the phone orby face to face (Fried & Fottler, 2015). Imelda would have been incapable of efficientlycommunicating it and thus would not be fit for the position since her thick Filipino accent wouldbe difficult to comprehend appropriately.According to the disparate theory, one is discriminated upon based on their protectedstatus. However, Imelda was not discriminated against since communication was tantamount forproper functionality in that position (Fried & Fottler, 2015). She would have found it difficult toconvey the necessary information as directed by the city and would as a consequence prove to bea liability in that position.There was no discrimination in the actual sense of the wor ...
To Order an Original Plagiarism Free Paper on the Same Topic Click Here
Other samples, services and questions:
When you use PaperHelp, you save one valuable — TIME
You can spend it for more important things than paper writing.